EMFANDHEALTH.COM KEYWORD DENSITY CHECKER

Total words: 4217 | 2-word phrases: 1095 | 3-word phrases: 1262 | 4-word phrases: 1310

PAGE INFO

Title Try to keep the title under 60 characters (15 characters)
EMF&Health Home
Description Try to keep the meta description between 50 - 160 characters (367 characters)
This web site will be devoted to the subject of EMF and health based on real science.There is growing alarm about the issue of EMF and health whether from high voltage power lines, cell phones, cell phone towers, WiFi networks, and so called dirty electricity, etc.We present the preponderance of scientific evidence which shows that EMF does not cause health issues.
Keywords Meta keywords are not recommended anymore (367 characters)
EMF, health, electromagnetic radiation, cell phones, mobile phones,EHS, electrohypersensitivity, WiFi, wireless, transmission lines, cell phone towers, masts. BioInitiative Report, Bio-Initiative, dirty electricity
H1 No H1 tag on the page (0 characters)

ONE WORD PHRASES 550 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1the5710.36%
2of448.00%
3in285.09%
4studies244.36%
5on234.18%
6and224.00%
7no213.82%
8health193.45%
9that193.45%
10study193.45%

TWO WORD PHRASES 1095 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1cell phone121.10%
2brain cancer?90.82%
3brain cancer90.82%
4rat study80.73%
5of the70.64%
6expert review60.55%
7from emf60.55%
8on a50.46%
9of emf50.46%
10evidence of50.46%
11study no50.46%
12cell phones40.37%
13health effects40.37%
14have been40.37%
15on the40.37%
16in vitro40.37%
17that the40.37%
18the world40.37%
19as the40.37%
20harm from40.37%

THREE WORD PHRASES 1262 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1science based medicine40.32%
2this web site40.32%
3harm from emf40.32%
4evidence of harm40.32%
5cell phone use30.24%
6no evidence of30.24%
7no harm from30.24%
8on science based30.24%
9our page on30.24%
10emf and health30.24%
11in vitro studies30.24%
12is that the30.24%
13standing committee on20.16%
14activists and a20.16%
15far more comprehensive20.16%
16safety code 620.16%
17as well as20.16%
18canada standing committee20.16%
19see our page20.16%
20web site will20.16%
21such as the20.16%
22post on science20.16%
23evidence based science20.16%
24not been replicated20.16%
25comprehensive and rigorous20.16%
26scientific evidence the20.16%
27is that there20.16%
28health effects of20.16%
29in brain cancer20.16%
30shown no consistent20.16%

FOUR WORD PHRASES 1310 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1no harm from emf30.23%
2on science based medicine30.23%
3see our page on20.15%
4more comprehensive and rigorous20.15%
5as well as the20.15%
6this web site will20.15%
7cell phone rat study20.15%
8no evidence of harm20.15%
9on the issue of20.15%
10comprehensive and rigorous studies20.15%
11on this web site20.15%
12far more comprehensive and20.15%
13standing committee on health20.15%
14canada standing committee on20.15%
15of the scientific literature20.15%
16the issue of emf20.15%
17existing safety guidelines in20.15%
18post on science based20.15%
19seize upon this standard10.08%
20upon this standard scientific10.08%
21activists seize upon this10.08%
22this standard scientific conservatism10.08%
23to exaggerate the degree10.08%
24exaggerate the degree of10.08%
25found activists seize upon10.08%
26the degree of scientific10.08%
27degree of scientific uncertainty10.08%
28   front page       about10.08%
29of scientific uncertainty they10.08%
30scientific uncertainty they keep10.08%
31uncertainty they keep promoting10.08%
32many of the same10.08%
33of the same questionable10.08%
34the same questionable or10.08%
35same questionable or poorly10.08%
36questionable or poorly executed10.08%
37or poorly executed scientific10.08%
38poorly executed scientific studies10.08%
39while ignoring far more10.08%
40ignoring far more comprehensive10.08%

EXTERNAL LINKS

# URL Whois Check
1http://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPnote2018.pdf Whoisicnirp.org
2 http://montrealgazette.com/opinion/opinion-study-on-cellphones-and-cancer-is-reassuring Whoismontrealgazette.com
3 http://sciencebasedmedicine.org/cell-phones-and-cancer-random-chance-in-clinical-trials/ Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
4 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/are-cell-phones-a-possible-carcinogen-an-update-on-the-iarc-report/ Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
5 http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html Whoiscancer.gov
6 http://www.europeanscientist.com/en/research/national-toxicology-program-study-tell-us-radio-frequency-fields/ Whoiseuropeanscientist.com
7 http://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-nation-indulges-in-some-particularly-egregious-fear-mongering-about-cell-phones-and-cancer/ Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
8 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/health/cancer-study-radiation-cellphones.html Whoisnytimes.com
9 http://www.theglobaleconomy.com/USA/Mobile_phone_subscribers/ Whoistheglobaleconomy.com
10 http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html Whoiscancer.gov
11 http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/it-s-premature-to-conclude-that-cell-phones-cause-cancer-in-humans/ Whoisscientificamerican.com
12 http://www.vox.com/2016/5/27/11797924/cellphones-cancer-bad-reporting Whoisvox.com
13 http://www.forbes.com/sites/geoffreykabat/2016/05/28/the-new-rat-study-of-cell-phone-radiation-is-no-smoking-gun/#28c012b47d6b Whoisforbes.com
14 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/no-a-rat-study-with-marginal-results-does-not-prove-that-cell-phones-cause-cancer-no-matter-what-mother-jones-and-consumer-reports-say/ Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
15 http://theconversation.com/new-study-no-increase-in-brain-cancer-across-29-years-of-mobile-use-in-australia-58927 Whoistheconversation.com
16 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/about-that-cell-phone-and-cancer-study/ Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
17 http://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/index1.html Whoiswho.int
18 http://ieee-emf.com/IEEEdatabase.cfm Whoisieee-emf.com
19 http://centreforinquiry.ca/canadas-standing-committee-on-health-hesa-report-13/ Whoiscentreforinquiry.ca
20 http://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/news-events-and-notices/news/news-2015/02/mobile-phones-not-causing-increase-in-brain-tumours.html Whoisac.nz
21 http://rsc-src.ca/en/expert-panels/rsc-reports/review-safety-code-6-potential-health-risks-radiofrequency-fields-from Whoisrsc-src.ca
22 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/safety-study-of-phone-and-wi-fi-radio-waves-calls-for-more-research/article17752580/ Whoistheglobeandmail.com
23 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Guidelines+safe+exposure+radio+waves+from+mobiles+WiFi+panel/9685624/story.html Whoisottawacitizen.com
24 http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2013/05/danish-school-experiment-with-wifi-routers-and-garden-cress-good-example-of-bad-science/ Whoispepijnvanerp.nl
25 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/picking-cherries-in-science-the-bio-initiative-report/#more-24907 Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
26 http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/31625/InTech-Evaluations_of_international_expert_group_reports_on_the_biological_effects_of_radiofrequency_fields.pdf Whoisintechopen.com
27 http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4273 Whoisskeptoid.com
28 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/are-cell-phones-a-possible-carcinogen-an-update-on-the-iarc-report/ Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
29 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17cellphones-t.html Whoisnytimes.com
30 http://www.webmd.com/cancer/brain-cancer/news/20110727/study-cell-phones-dont-raise-brain-cancer-risk-in-kids Whoiswebmd.com
31 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/No-link-seen-between-rb-661647704.html Whoisyahoo.com
32 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?s=emf Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
33 http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=9407 Whoissciencebasedmedicine.org
34 http://www.csicop.org/ Whoiscsicop.org
35 http://www.csicop.org/si/show/growing_hysteria/ Whoiscsicop.org
36 http://www.csicop.org/si/archive/category/volume_33.5 Whoiscsicop.org