| 1 | is in conformance with | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 2 | management system that is in | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 3 | of the special purpose | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 4 | at the same time | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 5 | with the requirements of | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 6 | conformance with the requirements | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 7 | in conformance with the | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 8 | system that is in conformance | | | | | | | 2 | 0.22% |
| 9 | skgroup’s advanced defense technology | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 10 | advanced defense technology and | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 11 | rd methods elvo’s aspires | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 12 | methods elvo’s aspires to | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 13 | elvo’s aspires to ascertain | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 14 | aspires to ascertain itself | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 15 | to ascertain itself as | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 16 | ascertain itself as one | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 17 | about elvo capabilities infrastructure | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 18 | itself as one of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 19 | vehicles expertise skgroup’s advanced | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 20 | as one of the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 21 | one of the key | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 22 | special purpose vehicles providers | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 23 | purpose vehicles providers for | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 24 | vehicles providers for the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 25 | providers for the broader | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 26 | for the broader geographical | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 27 | the broader geographical region | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 28 | expertise skgroup’s advanced defense | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 29 | value of plasan’s armored | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 30 | combat vehicles expertise skgroup’s | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 31 | complex requirements of modern | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 32 | the years to come | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 33 | years to come understanding | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 34 | the differentiating power of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 35 | differentiating power of cuttingedge | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 36 | power of cuttingedge superiority | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 37 | of cuttingedge superiority when | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 38 | cuttingedge superiority when addressing | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 39 | the complex requirements of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |
| 40 | requirements of modern ground | | | | | | | 1 | 0.11% |