| 1 | bren s google review | | | | | | | 5 | 0.33% |
| 2 | rachel m yelp review | | | | | | | 5 | 0.33% |
| 3 | el paso personal injury | | | | | | | 4 | 0.27% |
| 4 | received a net recovery | | | | | | | 4 | 0.27% |
| 5 | mind and fights for you with all he has bren s google | | | | | | | 4 | 0.27% |
| 6 | accident victim austin man | | | | | | | 4 | 0.27% |
| 7 | a net recovery of | | | | | | | 4 | 0.27% |
| 8 | paso personal injury lawyer | | | | | | | 3 | 0.20% |
| 9 | 10 reasons people choose | | | | | | | 3 | 0.20% |
| 10 | reasons people choose our | | | | | | | 3 | 0.20% |
| 11 | click here read more | | | | | | | 3 | 0.20% |
| 12 | man received a net | | | | | | | 3 | 0.20% |
| 13 | with the insurance companies | | | | | | | 3 | 0.20% |
| 14 | vehicle inspected client sustained | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 15 | austin man received a | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 16 | ended by a drunk | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 17 | rear ended by a | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 18 | was rear ended by | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 19 | recovery of 7616232 when | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 20 | net recovery of 7616232 | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 21 | was acquired by joe | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 22 | acquired by joe lopez | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 23 | inspected client sustained a | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 24 | joe lopez and subsequently | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 25 | victim austin man received | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 26 | by joe lopez and | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 27 | a sternum fracture 150000 | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 28 | sustained a sternum fracture | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 29 | client sustained a sternum | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 30 | a drunk driver who | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 31 | by a drunk driver | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 32 | se habla espanol 915 | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 33 | drunk driver who was | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 34 | a cervical herniation attorneys | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 35 | we dont get paid | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 36 | the stress of dealing | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 37 | case expenses were 1383768 | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 38 | and case expenses were | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 39 | 60000 and case expenses | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |
| 40 | were 60000 and case | | | | | | | 2 | 0.13% |