| 1 | file at rti surgical | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 2 | data on file at | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 3 | at rti surgical inc | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 4 | vary claims based on | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 5 | may vary claims based | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 6 | results may vary claims | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 7 | therefore results may vary | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 8 | you or a loved | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 9 | or a loved one | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 10 | on file at rti | | | | | | | 2 | 0.46% |
| 11 | in the following areas12 | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 12 | an outpatient setting where | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 13 | pain relief both immediately | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 14 | relief both immediately and | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 15 | both immediately and longterm | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 16 | immediately and longterm less | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 17 | setting where patients can | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 18 | outpatient setting where patients | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 19 | in an outpatient setting | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 20 | better outcomes lower infection | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 21 | procedure in an outpatient | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 22 | the procedure in an | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 23 | perform the procedure in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 24 | surgeon may choose to | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 25 | spine surgeon may choose | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 26 | and longterm less time | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 27 | the spine surgeon may | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 28 | experience better outcomes lower | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 29 | outcomes lower infection rates | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 30 | better in the following | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 31 | compared to fusion decompression | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 32 | performed better in the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 33 | device performed better in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 34 | coflex® device performed better | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 35 | decompression combined with the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 36 | fusion decompression combined with | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 37 | to fusion decompression combined | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 38 | results compared to fusion | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 39 | areas12 leg and back | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |
| 40 | proven results compared to | | | | | | | 1 | 0.23% |