Total words: 3195 | 2-word phrases: 778 | 3-word phrases: 948 | 4-word phrases: 1076
PAGE INFO
| Title | Try to keep the title under 60 characters (49 characters)
Chef-de-projet.fr : blog sur la gestion de projet |
| Description | Try to keep the meta description between 50 - 160 characters (0 characters)
|
| Keywords | Meta keywords are not recommended anymore (0 characters)
|
| H1 | H1 tag on the page (5 characters)
Tests |
ONE WORD PHRASES 393 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | de | | | | | | | 148 | 37.66% |
| 2 | gestion | | | | | | | 52 | 13.23% |
| 3 | pour | | | | | | | 41 | 10.43% |
| 4 | logiciel | | | | | | | 36 | 9.16% |
| 5 | la | | | | | | | 32 | 8.14% |
| 6 | outil | | | | | | | 30 | 7.63% |
| 7 | projet | | | | | | | 29 | 7.38% |
| 8 | 2021 | | | | | | | 23 | 5.85% |
| 9 | et | | | | | | | 21 | 5.34% |
| 10 | vaut | | | | | | | 21 | 5.34% |
TWO WORD PHRASES 778 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | projet ? | | | | | | | 63 | 8.10% |
| 2 | ? kantreeestce | | | | | | | 63 | 8.10% |
| 3 | ? odooque | | | | | | | 63 | 8.10% |
| 4 | de projet | | | | | | | 43 | 5.53% |
| 5 | gestion de | | | | | | | 42 | 5.40% |
| 6 | de ge | | | | | | | 35 | 4.50% |
| 7 | de ges | | | | | | | 34 | 4.37% |
| 8 | de gest | | | | | | | 33 | 4.24% |
| 9 | de gesti | | | | | | | 32 | 4.11% |
| 10 | de gestio | | | | | | | 31 | 3.98% |
| 11 | de gestion | | | | | | | 30 | 3.86% |
| 12 | logiciel de | | | | | | | 21 | 2.70% |
| 13 | que vaut | | | | | | | 20 | 2.57% |
| 14 | outil de | | | | | | | 20 | 2.57% |
| 15 | vaut ce | | | | | | | 17 | 2.19% |
| 16 | projets ? | | | | | | | 16 | 2.06% |
| 17 | ? beesbusyque | | | | | | | 16 | 2.06% |
| 18 | chef de | | | | | | | 15 | 1.93% |
| 19 | pour la | | | | | | | 14 | 1.80% |
| 20 | un outil | | | | | | | 14 | 1.80% |
THREE WORD PHRASES 948 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | de projet ? | | | | | | | 43 | 4.54% |
| 2 | gestion de projet | | | | | | | 25 | 2.64% |
| 3 | de gestion de | | | | | | | 21 | 2.22% |
| 4 | logiciel de ges | | | | | | | 16 | 1.69% |
| 5 | que vaut ce | | | | | | | 16 | 1.69% |
| 6 | logiciel de gest | | | | | | | 15 | 1.58% |
| 7 | logiciel de gesti | | | | | | | 14 | 1.48% |
| 8 | logiciel de gestio | | | | | | | 13 | 1.37% |
| 9 | la gestion de | | | | | | | 12 | 1.27% |
| 10 | par chef de | | | | | | | 12 | 1.27% |
| 11 | logiciel de gestion | | | | | | | 12 | 1.27% |
| 12 | chef de projet | | | | | | | 11 | 1.16% |
| 13 | pour la gest | | | | | | | 10 | 1.05% |
| 14 | pour la gestion | | | | | | | 9 | 0.95% |
| 15 | vaut ce logiciel | | | | | | | 9 | 0.95% |
| 16 | outil de gestion | | | | | | | 8 | 0.84% |
| 17 | un outil de | | | | | | | 8 | 0.84% |
| 18 | lire la suite | | | | | | | 6 | 0.63% |
| 19 | avis sur ce | | | | | | | 6 | 0.63% |
| 20 | publié par chef | | | | | | | 6 | 0.63% |
| 21 | le logiciel de | | | | | | | 5 | 0.53% |
| 22 | de projets e | | | | | | | 5 | 0.53% |
| 23 | gestion de projets | | | | | | | 5 | 0.53% |
| 24 | outil de planification | | | | | | | 5 | 0.53% |
| 25 | ce logiciel de | | | | | | | 5 | 0.53% |
| 26 | et comment le | | | | | | 4 | 0.42% |
| 27 | de transition ? | | | | | | | 4 | 0.42% |
| 28 | gestion de stock | | | | | | | 4 | 0.42% |
| 29 | de projets et | | | | | | | 4 | 0.42% |
| 30 | stock et inventaire | | | | | | | 4 | 0.42% |
FOUR WORD PHRASES 1076 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | gestion de projet ? | | | | | | | 25 | 2.32% |
| 2 | de gestion de projet | | | | | | | 13 | 1.21% |
| 3 | logiciel de gestion de | | | | | | | 12 | 1.12% |
| 4 | par chef de projet | | | | | | | 9 | 0.84% |
| 5 | pour la gestion de | | | | | | | 9 | 0.84% |
| 6 | que vaut ce logiciel | | | | | | | 9 | 0.84% |
| 7 | la gestion de projet | | | | | | | 7 | 0.65% |
| 8 | publié par chef de | | | | | | | 6 | 0.56% |
| 9 | outil de gestion de | | | | | | | 5 | 0.46% |
| 10 | vaut ce logiciel de | | | | | | | 5 | 0.46% |
| 11 | le logiciel de ges | | | | | | | 4 | 0.37% |
| 12 | d’icebreaker pour lancer vos | | | | | | | 4 | 0.37% |
| 13 | gestion de stock et | | | | | | | 4 | 0.37% |
| 14 | de stock et inventaire | | | | | | | 4 | 0.37% |
| 15 | avis sur cet outil | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 16 | cet outil kanban p | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 17 | teamganttque vaut ce logiciel | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 18 | manager de transition ? | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 19 | outil pour le pi | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 20 | de gestion de por | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 21 | sur cet outil kanban | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 22 | outil de pilotage pour | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 23 | quoi et comment le | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 24 | trellomon avis sur cet | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 25 | paymonotre avis sur ce | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 26 | avis sur ce logiciel | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 27 | vaut le logiciel de | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 28 | outil de planification collab | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 29 | logiciels de gestion de | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 30 | de gestion de projets | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 31 | avis bubble planl’outil de | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 32 | par chef de projetclassement | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 33 | chef de projetclassement outils | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 34 | comment le préparer ? | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 35 | c’est quoi et comment | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 36 | comment se former au | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 37 | cet outil pour le | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 38 | de pilotage pour les | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 39 | projectque vaut le logiciel | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
| 40 | bubble planl’outil de plan | | | | | | | 3 | 0.28% |
EXTERNAL LINKS