CES-EEC.CA KEYWORD DENSITY CHECKER

Total words: 1690 | 2-word phrases: 454 | 3-word phrases: 486 | 4-word phrases: 491

PAGE INFO

Title Try to keep the title under 60 characters (23 characters)
Canadian Election Study
Description Try to keep the meta description between 50 - 160 characters (0 characters)
Keywords Meta keywords are not recommended anymore (0 characters)
H1 H1 tag on the page (4 characters)
Home

ONE WORD PHRASES 259 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1the3011.58%
2and249.27%
3of197.34%
4ces124.63%
5in93.47%
6to83.09%
7is83.09%
8on72.70%
9as72.70%
10a72.70%

TWO WORD PHRASES 454 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1such as51.10%
2the ces40.88%
3on electoral30.66%
4with the30.66%
5and attitudes30.66%
6and the30.66%
7election year30.66%
8consortium on30.66%
9of the20.44%
10by the20.44%
11has been20.44%
12in canada20.44%
13the consortium20.44%
14electoral democracy20.44%
15nonelection years20.44%
16ces has20.44%
17been a20.44%
18each election20.44%
191965 the20.44%
20since 196520.44%

THREE WORD PHRASES 486 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1consortium on electoral30.62%
2on electoral democracy20.41%
3since 1965 the20.41%
4the consortium on20.41%
5size prior to10.21%
6their size prior10.21%
7of their size10.21%
8virtue of their10.21%
9by virtue of10.21%
10provide by virtue10.21%
11been able to10.21%
12have been able10.21%
13studies have been10.21%
14home 2021 ces10.21%
15to 2019 ces10.21%
16previous studies have10.21%
17than previous studies10.21%
18microlevel than previous10.21%
19the microlevel than10.21%
20at the microlevel10.21%
21preferences at the10.21%
22electoral participation and10.21%
23to electoral participation10.21%
24barriers to electoral10.21%
25of barriers to10.21%
26analysis of barriers10.21%
27prior to 201910.21%
282019 ces datasets10.21%
29more finegrained analysis10.21%
3037000 respondents were10.21%

FOUR WORD PHRASES 491 Words

# Keyword H1 Title Des Volume Position Suggest Frequency Density
1consortium on electoral democracy20.41%
2the consortium on electoral20.41%
3home 2021 ces 201910.20%
4analysis of barriers to10.20%
5than previous studies have10.20%
6microlevel than previous studies10.20%
7the microlevel than previous10.20%
8at the microlevel than10.20%
9preferences at the microlevel10.20%
10to electoral participation and10.20%
11barriers to electoral participation10.20%
12of barriers to electoral10.20%
13more finegrained analysis of10.20%
14finegrained analysis of barriers10.20%
15studies have been able10.20%
16a more finegrained analysis10.20%
17ces studies allow for10.20%
18recent ces studies allow10.20%
19most recent ces studies10.20%
20the most recent ces10.20%
21voters the most recent10.20%
22on voters the most10.20%
23locality on voters the10.20%
24previous studies have been10.20%
25have been able to10.20%
26impact of locality on10.20%
27across the country in10.20%
28attitudesbehaviour in nonelection years10.20%
29respondents were gathered 2 studying10.20%
3037000 respondents were gathered10.20%
31over 37000 respondents were10.20%
32of over 37000 respondents10.20%
33attitudes of over 3700010.20%
34the attitudes of over10.20%
35in 2019 for example10.20%
36country in 2019 for10.20%
37the country in 201910.20%
38respondents across the country10.20%
39provide by virtue of10.20%
404000 respondents across the10.20%

EXTERNAL LINKS

# URL Whois Check
1http://c-dem.ca Whoisc-dem.ca