Total words: 2570 | 2-word phrases: 687 | 3-word phrases: 768 | 4-word phrases: 786
PAGE INFO
| Title | Try to keep the title under 60 characters (43 characters)
Rep and Weight Calculator - 1RM - 1 rep max |
| Description | Try to keep the meta description between 50 - 160 characters (71 characters)
Calculate your 1 rep max and other rep schemes using multiple formulas. |
| Keywords | Meta keywords are not recommended anymore (0 characters)
|
| H1 | No H1 tag on the page (0 characters)
|
ONE WORD PHRASES 329 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | the | | | | | | | 30 | 9.12% |
| 2 | to | | | | | | | 23 | 6.99% |
| 3 | and | | | | | | | 22 | 6.69% |
| 4 | a | | | | | | | 20 | 6.08% |
| 5 | you | | | | | | | 18 | 5.47% |
| 6 | 1rm | | | | | | | 16 | 4.86% |
| 7 | with | | | | | | | 15 | 4.56% |
| 8 | is | | | | | | | 14 | 4.26% |
| 9 | reps | | | | | | | 14 | 4.26% |
| 10 | for | | | | | | | 13 | 3.95% |
TWO WORD PHRASES 687 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | calculated with | | | | | | | 6 | 0.87% |
| 2 | you can | | | | | | | 6 | 0.87% |
| 3 | one rep | | | | | | | 5 | 0.73% |
| 4 | weight and | | | | | | | 4 | 0.58% |
| 5 | this site | | | | | | | 4 | 0.58% |
| 6 | rep max | | | | | | | 4 | 0.58% |
| 7 | on a | | | | | | | 4 | 0.58% |
| 8 | your 1rm | | | | | | | 4 | 0.58% |
| 9 | amount of | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 10 | a certain | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 11 | in the | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 12 | and reps | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 13 | or a | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 14 | can be | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 15 | the formulas | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 16 | it is | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 17 | 1rm a | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 18 | want to | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 19 | the weight | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
| 20 | of reps | | | | | | | 3 | 0.44% |
THREE WORD PHRASES 768 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | one rep max | | | | | | | 4 | 0.52% |
| 2 | amount of reps | | | | | | | 3 | 0.39% |
| 3 | weight and reps | | | | | | | 3 | 0.39% |
| 4 | is calculated with | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 5 | rep max 1rm | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 6 | is a good | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 7 | your tested 1rm | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 8 | you can lift | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 9 | be calculated using | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 10 | of your 1rm | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 11 | a certain amount | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 12 | using a formula | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 13 | calculated using a | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 14 | a formula such | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 15 | lifters eg difference | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 16 | may be calculated | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 17 | 1rm may be | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 18 | formula such as | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 19 | ratio 1rm may | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 20 | such as brzycki | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 21 | as brzycki est | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 22 | fastslow muscle fiber | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 23 | in fastslow muscle | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 24 | difference in fastslow | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 25 | eg difference in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 26 | javascript is off | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 27 | between lifters eg | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 28 | are fairly accurate | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 29 | have been used | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 30 | been used for | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
FOUR WORD PHRASES 786 Words
| # |
Keyword |
H1 |
Title |
Des |
Volume |
Position |
Suggest |
Frequency |
Density |
| 1 | one rep max 1rm | | | | | | | 2 | 0.25% |
| 2 | javascript is off theres | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 3 | be fully accurate due | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 4 | for typical exercises they | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 5 | typical exercises they can | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 6 | exercises they can never | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 7 | they can never be | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 8 | can never be fully | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 9 | never be fully accurate | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 10 | differences between lifters eg | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 11 | fully accurate due to | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 12 | time and are fairly | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 13 | between lifters eg difference | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 14 | lifters eg difference in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 15 | eg difference in fastslow | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 16 | difference in fastslow muscle | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 17 | in fastslow muscle fiber | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 18 | ratio 1rm may be | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 19 | and are fairly accurate | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 20 | long time and are | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 21 | may be calculated using | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 22 | lifters each of the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 23 | and tested on a | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 24 | tested on a new | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 25 | on a new group | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 26 | a new group of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 27 | new group of lifters | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 28 | group of lifters each | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 29 | of lifters each of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 30 | each of the formulas | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 31 | a long time and | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 32 | of the formulas used | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 33 | on this site have | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 34 | this site have been | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 35 | site have been used | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 36 | have been used for | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 37 | been used for a | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 38 | used for a long | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 39 | for a long time | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 40 | 1rm may be calculated | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
EXTERNAL LINKS