1 | services pretrial research venue | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
2 | to serve as jurors | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
3 | consulting services pretrial research | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
4 | jury selection additional services | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
5 | practice areas business litigation | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
6 | civil rights employment litigation | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
7 | rights employment litigation government | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
8 | pretrial research venue evaluation | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
9 | bonora and her colleagues | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
10 | beth bonora and her | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
11 | property personal injuryconsumer litigation | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
12 | tools you need to | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
13 | you need to help | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
14 | need to help you | | | | | | | 2 | 0.15% |
15 | the case that helped | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
16 | alexis provided us with | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
17 | we needed in our | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
18 | insights we needed in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
19 | provided us with the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
20 | us secure the win | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
21 | jury selection alexis provided | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
22 | selection alexis provided us | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
23 | for our client her | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
24 | to jury selection alexis | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
25 | research to jury selection | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
26 | pretrial research to jury | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
27 | our client her thoughts | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
28 | helped us secure the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
29 | needed in our fraud | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
30 | case that helped us | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
31 | in our fraud and | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
32 | our fraud and embezzlement | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
33 | fraud and embezzlement case | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
34 | and embezzlement case she | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
35 | of dek ketchum from | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
36 | embezzlement case she identified | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
37 | the strengths and weaknesses | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
38 | strengths and weaknesses in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
39 | and weaknesses in the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |
40 | weaknesses in the case | | | | | | | 1 | 0.07% |