| 1 | assessing its efficacy in | | | | | | | 2 | 0.26% |
| 2 | treated with agrarius retained | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 3 | successfully demonstrated the product | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 4 | demonstrated the product in | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 5 | the product in our | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 6 | product in our agricultural | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 7 | in our agricultural showroom | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 8 | corn crops treated with | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 9 | crops treated with agrarius | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 10 | 20 yield increase of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 11 | that corn crops treated | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 12 | across 30 different crop | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 13 | 30 different crop types | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 14 | different crop types and | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 15 | crop types and the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 16 | types and the yield | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 17 | and the yield results | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 18 | the yield results compared | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 19 | we successfully demonstrated the | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 20 | showcased that corn crops | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 21 | with agrarius retained a | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 22 | with just two foliar | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 23 | longer and healthier cobs | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 24 | and healthier cobs of | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 25 | healthier cobs of corn | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 26 | improvement of nearly 20 | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 27 | of nearly 20 with | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 28 | nearly 20 with just | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 29 | 20 with just two | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 30 | just two foliar spray | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 31 | trial showcased that corn | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 32 | two foliar spray applications | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 33 | enhancing yield and production | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 34 | yield increase of agrarius™ | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 35 | during an abnormally dry | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 36 | an abnormally dry summer | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 37 | cane assessing its efficacy | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 38 | the trial showcased that | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 39 | yield results compared to | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |
| 40 | sugar cane assessing its | | | | | | | 1 | 0.13% |